MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) 386 U.S. 684

MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.

35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N. E. 2d 494, appeal dismissed.

Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 386 U.S. 684, 685




U.S. Supreme Court Reports

MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) 386 U.S. 684

MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.

35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N. E. 2d 494, appeal dismissed.

Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 386 U.S. 684, 685

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.