MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967) MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.
35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N.E.2d 494, appeal dismissed.
Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIR., REV. OF ILLINOIS., 386 U.S. 684 (1967)386 U.S. 684"> MILLER BREWING CO. v. JONES, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 17, 1967.
35 Ill. 2d 86, 219 N.E.2d 494, appeal dismissed.
Frank H. Uriell and Paul A. Teschner for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 386 U.S. 684, 685
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.