FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 544 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 544 (1967)

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 544 (1967) 386 U.S. 544

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 638.
Decided April 10, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 639, City of Tampa v. United States et al.; No. 640, Railway Labor Executives' Association et al. v. United States et al.; and No. 641, Southern Railway System v. United States, also on appeal from the same court.

259 F. Supp. 993, affirmed in Nos. 638, 639 and 641, dismissed as moot in No. 640.

A. Alvis Layne for appellant in No. 638; Wm. Reece Smith, Jr., for appellant in No. 639; Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., William G. Mahoney and

Page 386 U.S. 544, 545

William J. Hickey for appellants in No. 640; W. Graham Claytor, Jr., and John K. Mallory, Jr., for appellant in No. 641.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Richard A. Posner, Edwin M. Zimmerman and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States in Nos. 638, 639 and 641; Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn and Betty Jo Christian for the Interstate Commerce Commission in Nos. 638, 639 and 641; Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons for Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

James M. Weaver filed a brief for the Tampa Port Authority, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. Lewis W. Petteway and B. Kenneth Gatlin filed a brief for the Florida Public Service Commission, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the motions to affirm.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm in Nos. 638, 639, and 641 are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

The motion to dismiss in No. 640 is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in Nos. 638, 639, and 641.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. [386 U.S. 544, 546]


U.S. Supreme Court Reports

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 544 (1967)

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 544 (1967) 386 U.S. 544

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 638.
Decided April 10, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 639, City of Tampa v. United States et al.; No. 640, Railway Labor Executives' Association et al. v. United States et al.; and No. 641, Southern Railway System v. United States, also on appeal from the same court.

259 F. Supp. 993, affirmed in Nos. 638, 639 and 641, dismissed as moot in No. 640.

A. Alvis Layne for appellant in No. 638; Wm. Reece Smith, Jr., for appellant in No. 639; Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., William G. Mahoney and

Page 386 U.S. 544, 545

William J. Hickey for appellants in No. 640; W. Graham Claytor, Jr., and John K. Mallory, Jr., for appellant in No. 641.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Richard A. Posner, Edwin M. Zimmerman and Lionel Kestenbaum for the United States in Nos. 638, 639 and 641; Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn and Betty Jo Christian for the Interstate Commerce Commission in Nos. 638, 639 and 641; Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons for Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

James M. Weaver filed a brief for the Tampa Port Authority, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. Lewis W. Petteway and B. Kenneth Gatlin filed a brief for the Florida Public Service Commission, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the motions to affirm.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm in Nos. 638, 639, and 641 are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

The motion to dismiss in No. 640 is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in Nos. 638, 639, and 641.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 386 U.S. 544, 546

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.