ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 386 U.S. 480 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 386 U.S. 480 (1967) ROGERS ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 998.
Decided March 27, 1967.
___ Colo. ___, 419 P.2d 648, appeal dismissed.
Harry L. Arkin for appellants.
Max P. Zall, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
ROGERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 386 U.S. 480 (1967)386 U.S. 480"> ROGERS ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 998.
Decided March 27, 1967.
___ Colo. ___, 419 P.2d 648, appeal dismissed.
Harry L. Arkin for appellants.
Max P. Zall, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 386 U.S. 480, 481
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.