BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 386 U.S. 479 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 386 U.S. 479 (1967) BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 647.
Argued March 20, 1967
Decided March 27, 1967.
247 S. C. 22, 145 S.E.2d 439, reversed.
Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Charles E. Washington, Jr.
Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and Randolph Murdaugh.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is reversed. Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (1967).
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 386 U.S. 479 (1967)386 U.S. 479"> BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 647.
Argued March 20, 1967
Decided March 27, 1967.
247 S. C. 22, 145 S.E.2d 439, reversed.
Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Charles E. Washington, Jr.
Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and Randolph Murdaugh.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is reversed. Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (1967).
Page 386 U.S. 479, 480
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
