NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 349 (1967)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 349 (1967) 386 U.S. 349

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 968.
Decided March 20, 1967.

256 F. Supp. 634, affirmed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, Dunton F. Tynan, Assistant Solicitor General, Matthew A. Tiffany, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter J. Myskowski for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.

R. J. Murphy and D. M. Tolmie for appellee railroads; William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Eugene T. Liipfert for the Port Authority of Allegheny County et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 349, 350

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 349 (1967) 386 U.S. 349 (1967) 386 U.S. 349 386 U.S. 349"> NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 968.
Decided March 20, 1967.

256 F. Supp. 634, affirmed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, Dunton F. Tynan, Assistant Solicitor General, Matthew A. Tiffany, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter J. Myskowski for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.

R. J. Murphy and D. M. Tolmie for appellee railroads; William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Eugene T. Liipfert for the Port Authority of Allegheny County et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 349, 350