GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed.

Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 348, 349

 


U.S. Supreme Court Reports

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, <a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/348/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/348/">386 U.S. 348</a></a> (1967) 386 U.S. 348

386 U.S. 348"> GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed.

Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 348, 349

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.