GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed.

Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 348, 349

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348 386 U.S. 348"> GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed.

Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.

Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 348, 349