GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.
258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed.
Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.
258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed. Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al. Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 386 U.S. 348, 349
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348 (1967) 386 U.S. 348 386 U.S. 348"> GULF-CANAL LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 947.
Decided March 20, 1967.
258 F. Supp. 864, affirmed. Harry C. Ames, Jr., T. Randolph Buck, Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al. Nuel D. Belnap and Richard J. Hardy for Waterways Freight Bureau, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 386 U.S. 348, 349
Search This Case
