DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967) DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 533, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 416.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY, 386 U.S. 284 (1967)386 U.S. 284"> DECKARD v. WARDEN, MISSOURI PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 533, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration. Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U.S. 214; Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406, 416.
Page 386 U.S. 284, 285
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.