LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) 386 U.S. 270

LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 938.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing.

Page 386 U.S. 270, 271

 


U.S. Supreme Court Reports

LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, <a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/270/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/270/">386 U.S. 270</a></a> (1967) 386 U.S. 270

386 U.S. 270"> LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 938.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Affirmed.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing.

Page 386 U.S. 270, 271

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.