LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) 386 U.S. 270LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 938.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Affirmed.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 938.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Affirmed. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing. Page 386 U.S. 270, 271
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
LOUISIANA v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 270 (1967) 386 U.S. 270 (1967) 386 U.S. 270 386 U.S. 270"> LOUISIANA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 938.
Decided March 13, 1967.
Affirmed. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Thomas W. McFerrin and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Alan G. Marer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for hearing. Page 386 U.S. 270, 271
Search This Case
