WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) 386 U.S. 268

WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL. v. APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
PUERTO RICO. No. 726.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Affirmed.

Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants.

J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 268, 269

 


U.S. Supreme Court Reports

WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, 386 U.S. 268 (1967) WACKENHUT CORP. v. APONTE, <a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/268/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/268/">386 U.S. 268</a></a> (1967) 386 U.S. 268

386 U.S. 268"> WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL. v. APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
PUERTO RICO. No. 726.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Affirmed.

Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants.

J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 386 U.S. 268, 269

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.