ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 264 (1967)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) 386 U.S. 264

ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and George J. Roth, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Page 386 U.S. 264, 265




U.S. Supreme Court Reports

ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 264 (1967) 386 U.S. 264

ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 12, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and George J. Roth, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Page 386 U.S. 264, 265

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.