YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, 386 U.S. 261 (1967)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, 386 U.S. 261 (1967) YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, 386 U.S. 261 (1967) 386 U.S. 261

YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIRCUIT. No. 1193, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 386 U.S. 261, 262

 


U.S. Supreme Court Reports

YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, 386 U.S. 261 (1967) YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE, <a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/261/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/386/261/">386 U.S. 261</a></a> (1967) 386 U.S. 261

386 U.S. 261"> YOUNG v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIRCUIT. No. 1193, Misc.
Decided March 13, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 386 U.S. 261, 262

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.