KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court Reports

KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17

KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR
OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 300.
Decided February 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N. Y. S. 2d 69, vacated and remanded.

Morton Liftin for petitioner.

Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530.

Page 386 U.S. 17, 18




U.S. Supreme Court Reports

KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17

KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR
OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 300.
Decided February 13, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N. Y. S. 2d 69, vacated and remanded.

Morton Liftin for petitioner.

Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530.

Page 386 U.S. 17, 18

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.