KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON
DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR
OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 300.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N.Y.S.2d 69, vacated and remanded.
Morton Liftin for petitioner.
Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
KAYE v. CO-ORDIN. COMM., DISC., ASS'N, CITY, N. YORK, 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17 (1967) 386 U.S. 17 386 U.S. 17">KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAROF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 300.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N.Y.S.2d 69, vacated and remanded. Morton Liftin for petitioner. Angelo T. Cometa for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500. MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530. Page 386 U.S. 17, 18