BARLOW v. TEXAS, 386 U.S. 16 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BARLOW v. TEXAS, 386 U.S. 16 (1967) BARLOW v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 109.
Decided February 13, 1967.
398 S.W.2d 933, appeal dismissed.
Alto B. Cervin for appellant.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and Charles B. Swanner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgment of the court below for the reasons stated in the opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 569.
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BARLOW v. TEXAS, 386 U.S. 16 (1967)386 U.S. 16"> BARLOW v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 109.
Decided February 13, 1967.
398 S.W.2d 933, appeal dismissed.
Alto B. Cervin for appellant.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and Charles B. Swanner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgment of the court below for the reasons stated in the opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 569.
Page 386 U.S. 16, 17
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
