HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)
385 U.S. 98 HALL v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 672, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.
187 So. 2d 861, appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)
385 U.S. 98 HALL v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 672, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.
187 So. 2d 861, appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Page 385 U.S. 98, 99
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.