HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)

385 U.S. 98

HALL v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 672, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.

187 So.2d 861, appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 98, 99




U.S. Supreme Court

HALL v. MISSISSIPPI, 385 U.S. 98 (1966)

385 U.S. 98

HALL v. MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 672, Misc.
Decided November 14, 1966.

187 So.2d 861, appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 98, 99

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.