LITTLE v. RHAY, 385 U.S. 96 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
LITTLE v. RHAY, 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96LITTLE v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 669, Misc. Decided November 14, 1966.
68 Wash. 2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Francis Conklin for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96 BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 2, ET AL. v. HASKELL COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 560. Decided November 14, 1966. 197 Kan. 321, 416 P.2d 791, appeal dismissed. Dale M. Stucky for appellants. Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LITTLE v. RHAY, 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96LITTLE v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 669, Misc. Decided November 14, 1966.
68 Wash. 2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Francis Conklin for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 96 (1966) 385 U.S. 96 BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 2, ET AL. v. HASKELL COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 560. Decided November 14, 1966. 197 Kan. 321, 416 P.2d 791, appeal dismissed. Dale M. Stucky for appellants. Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
