SPROWAL v. NEW YORK
385 U.S. 649 (1967)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

385 U.S. 649

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 825.
Decided January 23, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

Carl Rachlin for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 649, 650

FEIN v. NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/649/case.html">385 U.S. 649</a> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

385 U.S. 649

FEIN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 793.
Decided January 23, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.