SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO., 385 U.S. 537 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO., 385 U.S. 537 (1967)

385 U.S. 537

SHORT ET AL. v. NESS PRODUCE CO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 779.
Decided January 16, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 586, affirmed.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 537, 538




U.S. Supreme Court

SHORT v. NESS PRODUCE CO., 385 U.S. 537 (1967)

385 U.S. 537

SHORT ET AL. v. NESS PRODUCE CO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 779.
Decided January 16, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 586, affirmed.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 537, 538

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.