DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)
385 U.S. 455 DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.
Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)
385 U.S. 455 DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.
Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Page 385 U.S. 455, 456
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.