DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)

385 U.S. 455

DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.

255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.

Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

Page 385 U.S. 455, 456




U.S. Supreme Court

DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)

385 U.S. 455

DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.

255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.

Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

Page 385 U.S. 455, 456

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.