DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967) 385 U.S. 455DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded.
Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded. Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants. John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Page 385 U.S. 455, 456
U.S. Supreme Court
DUDDLESTON v. GRILLS, 385 U.S. 455 (1967) 385 U.S. 455 DUDDLESTON ET AL. v. GRILLS ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
255 F. Supp. 155, vacated and remanded. Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants. John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Page 385 U.S. 455, 456
Search This Case
