GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966)

385 U.S. 373

GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 658.
Decided December 12, 1966.

376 Mich. 135, 135 N. W. 2d 921; 378 Mich. 110, 142 N. W. 2d 686, appeal dismissed.

Aloysius F. Power for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and George M. Bourgon and Edward J. Setlock, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Appeal Board of the Michigan Employment Security Commission et al.; Abraham L. Zwerdling, Bruce A. Miller and Sheldon L. Klimist for Stinson et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 373, 374




U.S. Supreme Court

GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966)

385 U.S. 373

GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 658.
Decided December 12, 1966.

376 Mich. 135, 135 N. W. 2d 921; 378 Mich. 110, 142 N. W. 2d 686, appeal dismissed.

Aloysius F. Power for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and George M. Bourgon and Edward J. Setlock, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Appeal Board of the Michigan Employment Security Commission et al.; Abraham L. Zwerdling, Bruce A. Miller and Sheldon L. Klimist for Stinson et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 373, 374

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.