GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966) 385 U.S. 373GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF
THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 658.
Decided December 12, 1966.
376 Mich. 135, 135 N.W.2d 921; 378 Mich. 110, 142 N.W.2d 686, appeal dismissed.
Aloysius F. Power for appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and George M. Bourgon and Edward J. Setlock, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Appeal Board of the Michigan Employment Security Commission et al.; Abraham L. Zwerdling, Bruce A. Miller and Sheldon L. Klimist for Stinson et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
GENERAL MOTORS v. APPEAL BD. MICHIGAN EMP. SEC. COMM., 385 U.S. 373 (1966) 385 U.S. 373 GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. APPEAL BOARD OF THE MICHIGAN EMPLOYMENT SECURITYCOMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 658.
Decided December 12, 1966.
376 Mich. 135, 135 N.W.2d 921; 378 Mich. 110, 142 N.W.2d 686, appeal dismissed. Aloysius F. Power for appellant. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and George M. Bourgon and Edward J. Setlock, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Appeal Board of the Michigan Employment Security Commission et al.; Abraham L. Zwerdling, Bruce A. Miller and Sheldon L. Klimist for Stinson et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 385 U.S. 373, 374