EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 371 (1966) 385 U.S. 371

EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 644. Decided December 12, 1966.

Affirmed.

Robert L. Holtzclaw and James T. Johnson for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Earle V. White for Albany Food Products, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/371/case.html">385 U.S. 371</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 371 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, 385 U.S. 371 (1966) 385 U.S. 371

LAIRD & CO. ET AL. v. CHENEY, DIRECTOR OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 675. Decided December 12, 1966.

196 Kan. 675, 414 P.2d 18, appeal dismissed.

Harry W. Colmery and Robert E. Russell for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Park McGee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 371, 372

U.S. Supreme Court

EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 371 (1966) 385 U.S. 371

EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 644. Decided December 12, 1966.

Affirmed.

Robert L. Holtzclaw and James T. Johnson for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Earle V. White for Albany Food Products, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/371/case.html">385 U.S. 371</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 371 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, 385 U.S. 371 (1966) 385 U.S. 371

LAIRD & CO. ET AL. v. CHENEY, DIRECTOR OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 675. Decided December 12, 1966.

196 Kan. 675, 414 P.2d 18, appeal dismissed.

Harry W. Colmery and Robert E. Russell for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Park McGee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 371, 372

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.