FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA, 385 U.S. 370 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA, 385 U.S. 370 (1966) 385 U.S. 370 FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 581.
Decided December 12, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Edward L. Davenport for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MASON v. CITY OF BILOXI, 385 U.S. 370 (1966) 385 U.S. 370 MASON ET AL. v. CITY OF BILOXI.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 328.
Decided December 12, 1966.
Certiorari granted: 184 So.2d 113, reversed.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and R. Jess Brown for petitioners.
Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Mississippi is reversed. Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the case set for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA, 385 U.S. 370 (1966) 385 U.S. 370 FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 581.
Decided December 12, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Edward L. Davenport for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MASON v. CITY OF BILOXI, 385 U.S. 370 (1966) 385 U.S. 370 MASON ET AL. v. CITY OF BILOXI.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 328.
Decided December 12, 1966.
Certiorari granted: 184 So.2d 113, reversed.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and R. Jess Brown for petitioners.
Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Mississippi is reversed. Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the case set for oral argument.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
