GILES v. FRIENDLY FINANCE CO. OF BILOXI, INC., 385 U.S. 21 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

GILES v. FRIENDLY FINANCE CO. OF BILOXI, INC., 385 U.S. 21 (1966)

385 U.S. 21

GILES ET AL. v. FRIENDLY FINANCE CO. OF BILOXI, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 426.
Decided October 24, 1966.

185 So.2d 659, 664, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for appellants.

Charles B. Henley for appellees Guaranty Loan Corp. of Mississippi et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/21/case.html">385 U.S. 21</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 21 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 385 U.S. 21 (1966)

385 U.S. 21

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 88, Misc.
Decided October 24, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edward P. O'Brien and Lawrence R. Mansir, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 21, 22




U.S. Supreme Court

GILES v. FRIENDLY FINANCE CO. OF BILOXI, INC., 385 U.S. 21 (1966)

385 U.S. 21

GILES ET AL. v. FRIENDLY FINANCE CO. OF BILOXI, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 426.
Decided October 24, 1966.

185 So.2d 659, 664, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for appellants.

Charles B. Henley for appellees Guaranty Loan Corp. of Mississippi et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/21/case.html">385 U.S. 21</a> (1966) 385 U.S. 21 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA, 385 U.S. 21 (1966)

385 U.S. 21

JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 88, Misc.
Decided October 24, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edward P. O'Brien and Lawrence R. Mansir, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 21, 22

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.