MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, 385 U.S. 205 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, 385 U.S. 205 (1966)

385 U.S. 205

MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 634.
Decided December 5, 1966.

30 Wis. 2d 339, 141 N. W. 2d 287, appeal dismissed.

Erwin N. Griswold for appellant.

Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and E. Weston Wood, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 385 U.S. 205, 206




U.S. Supreme Court

MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, 385 U.S. 205 (1966)

385 U.S. 205

MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 634.
Decided December 5, 1966.

30 Wis. 2d 339, 141 N. W. 2d 287, appeal dismissed.

Erwin N. Griswold for appellant.

Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and E. Weston Wood, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 385 U.S. 205, 206

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.