BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES
385 U.S. 115 (1966)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 115 (1966)
385 U.S. 115 BATTAGLIA ET AL., DBA PRODUCE TRANSPORT DISPATCH v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 564.
Decided November 21, 1966.
Affirmed.
Earle V. White for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. Randall B. Kester, John F. Weisser, Jr., James W. Nisbet, J. D. Feeney and Ed White for railroad appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
