BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 115 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 115 (1966)

385 U.S. 115

BATTAGLIA ET AL., DBA PRODUCE TRANSPORT DISPATCH v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 564.
Decided November 21, 1966.

Affirmed.

Earle V. White for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. Randall B. Kester, John F. Weisser, Jr., James W. Nisbet, J. D. Feeney and Ed White for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 115, 116




U.S. Supreme Court

BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 115 (1966)

385 U.S. 115

BATTAGLIA ET AL., DBA PRODUCE TRANSPORT DISPATCH v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 564.
Decided November 21, 1966.

Affirmed.

Earle V. White for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. Randall B. Kester, John F. Weisser, Jr., James W. Nisbet, J. D. Feeney and Ed White for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 115, 116

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.