REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 REED v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 282.
Decided October 10, 1966.
33 Ill. 2d 535, 213 N. E. 2d 278, appeal dismissed.
Mort A. Segall for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 TREFFRY ET AL. v. TAYLOR, DIRECTOR OF LICENSES FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 291.
Decided October 10, 1966.
67 Wash. 2d 487, 408 P.2d 269, appeal dismissed.
Francis J. Conklin for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
REED v. ILLINOIS, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 REED v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 282.
Decided October 10, 1966.
33 Ill. 2d 535, 213 N. E. 2d 278, appeal dismissed.
Mort A. Segall for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)
385 U.S. 10 TREFFRY ET AL. v. TAYLOR, DIRECTOR OF LICENSES FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 291.
Decided October 10, 1966.
67 Wash. 2d 487, 408 P.2d 269, appeal dismissed.
Francis J. Conklin for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
