U.S. v. ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY., 384 U.S. 917 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY. , 384 U.S. 917 (1966)

384 U.S. 917

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY.
No. 1116.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 25, 1966

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Robert V. Zener, for the United States.

Jack Rephan, Raymond R. Dickey and Bernard Gordon, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. ACME Process Equipment Company. 384 U.S. 917 (1966) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY. , 384 U.S. 917 (1966)

 384 U.S. 917

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY.
No. 1116.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 25, 1966

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Robert V. Zener, for the United States.

Jack Rephan, Raymond R. Dickey and Bernard Gordon, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. ACME Process Equipment Company. 384 U.S. 917 (1966) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.