MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966)

384 U.S. 892

MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Vacated and remanded.

Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940.

Page 384 U.S. 892, 893

 


U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966)

384 U.S. 892

MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Vacated and remanded.

Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940.

Page 384 U.S. 892, 893

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.