BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)
384 U.S. 890 BAINES ET AL. v. CITY OF DANVILLE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 959.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 357 F.2d 756, affirmed.
Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and J. L. Williams for petitioners.
Rutledge C. Clement for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dispense with printing the petition for a writ of certiorari and the respondent's brief are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.
U.S. Supreme Court
BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)
384 U.S. 890 BAINES ET AL. v. CITY OF DANVILLE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 959.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 357 F.2d 756, affirmed.
Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and J. L. Williams for petitioners.
Rutledge C. Clement for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dispense with printing the petition for a writ of certiorari and the respondent's brief are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.
Page 384 U.S. 890, 891
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.