BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)

384 U.S. 890

BAINES ET AL. v. CITY OF DANVILLE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 959.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 357 F.2d 756, affirmed.

Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and J. L. Williams for petitioners.

Rutledge C. Clement for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dispense with printing the petition for a writ of certiorari and the respondent's brief are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.

Page 384 U.S. 890, 891

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BAINES v. CITY OF DANVILLE, 384 U.S. 890 (1966)

384 U.S. 890

BAINES ET AL. v. CITY OF DANVILLE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 959.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 357 F.2d 756, affirmed.

Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and J. L. Williams for petitioners.

Rutledge C. Clement for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dispense with printing the petition for a writ of certiorari and the respondent's brief are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.

Page 384 U.S. 890, 891

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.