UNITED STATES v. ATCHISON
Annotate this Case
384 U.S. 888 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. ATCHISON, 384 U.S. 888 (1966)384 U.S. 888
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 576.
Decided June 20, 1966.
238 F. Supp. 528, partially vacated and remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss portions of the judgment as moot.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States et al.
Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John E. McCullough, S. R. Brittingham, Jr., Charles W. Burkett, Monroe E. Clinton, Frank S. Farrell, Alan C. Furth, Lawrence W. Hobbs, Thormund A. Miller, Robert L. Pierce, E. P. Porter, L. E. Torinus, Jr., and E. L. Van Dellen for appellees, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.
Upon consideration of the memorandum of certain appellees and an examination of the entire record, so much of the judgment of the District Court as respects the portions of the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated March 21, 1963, and December 31, 1963, as were vacated by orders of the Commission of January 7, 1966, and March 17, 1966, and two orders of April 13, 1966, is vacated and to that extent the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss such portions of the judgment as moot.
[For order noting probable jurisdiction, see 383 U.S. 964.]
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.