LUCIGNANO v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

LUCIGNANO v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)

384 U.S. 884

LUCIGNANO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 1058.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 354 F.2d 1007, vacated and remanded.

Michael A. Querques and Daniel E. Isles for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.


HALE v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/884/case.html">384 U.S. 884</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 884 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HALE v. NEW JERSEY, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)

384 U.S. 884

HALE v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1502, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.

45 N. J. 255, 212 A. 2d 146, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, and Richard A. Koerner, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 884, 885




U.S. Supreme Court

LUCIGNANO v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)

384 U.S. 884

LUCIGNANO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 1058.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 354 F.2d 1007, vacated and remanded.

Michael A. Querques and Daniel E. Isles for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.


HALE v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/884/case.html">384 U.S. 884</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 884 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HALE v. NEW JERSEY, 384 U.S. 884 (1966)

384 U.S. 884

HALE v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1502, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.

45 N. J. 255, 212 A. 2d 146, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, and Richard A. Koerner, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 884, 885

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.