GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, 384 U.S. 718 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, 384 U.S. 718 (1966) 384 U.S. 718

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 1240. Decided June 13, 1966.

272 Minn. 403, 138 N. W. 2d 612, appeal dismissed.

Hayner N. Larson, Erwin A. Goldstein and Leon B. Seck for appellant.

Robert W. Mattson, Attorney General of Minnesota, Perry Voldness, Deputy Attorney General, and Ralph W. Peterson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GRAY v. ILLINOIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/718/case.html">384 U.S. 718</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 718 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GRAY v. ILLINOIS, 384 U.S. 718 (1966) 384 U.S. 718

GRAY v. ILLINOIS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1494, Misc. Decided June 13, 1966.

33 Ill. 2d 349, 211 N. E. 2d 369, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Elmer Gertz for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 718, 719

U.S. Supreme Court

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, 384 U.S. 718 (1966) 384 U.S. 718

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA. No. 1240. Decided June 13, 1966.

272 Minn. 403, 138 N. W. 2d 612, appeal dismissed.

Hayner N. Larson, Erwin A. Goldstein and Leon B. Seck for appellant.

Robert W. Mattson, Attorney General of Minnesota, Perry Voldness, Deputy Attorney General, and Ralph W. Peterson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GRAY v. ILLINOIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/718/case.html">384 U.S. 718</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 718 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GRAY v. ILLINOIS, 384 U.S. 718 (1966) 384 U.S. 718

GRAY v. ILLINOIS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1494, Misc. Decided June 13, 1966.

33 Ill. 2d 349, 211 N. E. 2d 369, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Elmer Gertz for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 718, 719

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.