POPE v. DAGGETT, 384 U.S. 33 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
POPE v. DAGGETT, 384 U.S. 33 (1966)
384 U.S. 33 POPE v. DAGGETT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 837, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 350 F.2d 296, vacated and remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.
U.S. Supreme Court
POPE v. DAGGETT, 384 U.S. 33 (1966)
384 U.S. 33 POPE v. DAGGETT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 837, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 350 F.2d 296, vacated and remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
