ENGLE v. KERNER, 384 U.S. 30 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
ENGLE v. KERNER, 384 U.S. 30 (1966) 384 U.S. 30 ENGLE v. KERNER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS v. SMITH, 384 U.S. 30 (1966) 384 U.S. 30AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS v. SMITH, DBA SMITH ENTERTAINMENT AGENCY
ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 808.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 349 F.2d 975, vacated and remanded.
William Power Maloney for petitioner.
Jerome G. Raidt for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
U.S. Supreme Court
ENGLE v. KERNER, 384 U.S. 30 (1966) 384 U.S. 30 ENGLE v. KERNER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1067.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
Page 384 U.S. 30, 31
U.S. Supreme Court
AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS v. SMITH, 384 U.S. 30 (1966) 384 U.S. 30AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS v. SMITH, DBA SMITH ENTERTAINMENT AGENCY
ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 808.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 349 F.2d 975, vacated and remanded.
William Power Maloney for petitioner.
Jerome G. Raidt for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.