RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 267 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 267 (1966) 384 U.S. 267

RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1167.
Decided May 23, 1966.

 66 Wash. 2d 851, 405 P.2d 719, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Kenneth A. MacDonald for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 267, 268

DAY v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/267/">384 U.S. 267</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 267 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 267 (1966) 384 U.S. 267

DAY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1086.
Decided May 23, 1966.

246 F. Supp. 689, affirmed.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and James L. Highsaw, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Charles W. Burkett, Herbert A. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellee Southern Pacific Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 267 (1966) 384 U.S. 267

RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1167.
Decided May 23, 1966.

 66 Wash. 2d 851, 405 P.2d 719, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Kenneth A. MacDonald for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 267, 268

DAY v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/267/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/267/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/267/">384 U.S. 267</a></a></a> (1966) 384 U.S. 267 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 267 (1966) 384 U.S. 267

DAY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1086.
Decided May 23, 1966.

246 F. Supp. 689, affirmed.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and James L. Highsaw, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Charles W. Burkett, Herbert A. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellee Southern Pacific Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.