UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966)
384 U.S. 212 UNITED STATES v. FISHER.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Joseph H. Stamler for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966)
384 U.S. 212 UNITED STATES v. FISHER.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Joseph H. Stamler for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.
Page 384 U.S. 212, 213
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.