HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 384 U.S. 211 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211 HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1352, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
HANSON v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211 HANSON ET AL. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 1170.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Robert O. Ellis, Jr., for petitioners.
William C. Beatty and Amos A. Bolen for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co., 382 U.S. 257.
U.S. Supreme Court
HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211 HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1352, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 384 U.S. 211, 212
U.S. Supreme Court
HANSON v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211 HANSON ET AL. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 1170.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Robert O. Ellis, Jr., for petitioners.
William C. Beatty and Amos A. Bolen for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co., 382 U.S. 257.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
