SELMAN v. PHILLIPS, 384 U.S. 210 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA.
No. 854, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alaska is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545.

Page 384 U.S. 210, 211

TOOMBS v. FORTSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/210/">384 U.S. 210</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 210 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TOOMBS v. FORTSON, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

TOOMBS ET AL. v. FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 1205.
Decided May 16, 1966.

 241 F. Supp. 65, affirmed.

Francis Shackelford, Edward S. White, Emmet J. Bondurant II, Israel Katz and Hamilton Lokey for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and E. Freeman Leverett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

SELMAN v. PHILLIPS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA.
No. 854, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alaska is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545.

Page 384 U.S. 210, 211

TOOMBS v. FORTSON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/210/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/210/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/210/">384 U.S. 210</a></a></a> (1966) 384 U.S. 210 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TOOMBS v. FORTSON, 384 U.S. 210 (1966) 384 U.S. 210

TOOMBS ET AL. v. FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 1205.
Decided May 16, 1966.

 241 F. Supp. 65, affirmed.

Francis Shackelford, Edward S. White, Emmet J. Bondurant II, Israel Katz and Hamilton Lokey for appellants.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and E. Freeman Leverett, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.