SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

384 U.S. 209

SIMMONS ET AL. v. SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON. No. 1112.
Decided May 16, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 808, affirmed.

L. Frederick Paul for appellants.

James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

IZZO v. EYMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/209/case.html">384 U.S. 209</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 209 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

IZZO v. EYMAN, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

384 U.S. 209

IZZO v. EYMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 869, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and James S. Tegart, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona is reversed. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368.

Page 384 U.S. 209, 210




U.S. Supreme Court

SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

384 U.S. 209

SIMMONS ET AL. v. SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON. No. 1112.
Decided May 16, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 808, affirmed.

L. Frederick Paul for appellants.

James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

IZZO v. EYMAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/209/case.html">384 U.S. 209</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 209 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

IZZO v. EYMAN, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

384 U.S. 209

IZZO v. EYMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 869, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and James S. Tegart, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona is reversed. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368.

Page 384 U.S. 209, 210

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.