WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 WINTERS v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1143.
Decided May 16, 1966.
67 Wash. 2d 465, 407 P.2d 988, appeal dismissed.
George R. Mosler for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 BARRIOS ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 WINTERS v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1143.
Decided May 16, 1966.
67 Wash. 2d 465, 407 P.2d 988, appeal dismissed.
George R. Mosler for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 384 U.S. 208, 209
U.S. Supreme Court
BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 BARRIOS ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.