WINTERS v. WASHINGTON
384 U.S. 208 (1966)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966)

384 U.S. 208

WINTERS v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1143.
Decided May 16, 1966.

67 Wash. 2d 465, 407 P.2d 988, appeal dismissed.

George R. Mosler for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 384 U.S. 208, 209

BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/208/case.html">384 U.S. 208</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 208 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, 384 U.S. 208 (1966)

384 U.S. 208

BARRIOS ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.