WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208

WINTERS v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1143.
Decided May 16, 1966.

 67 Wash. 2d 465, 407 P.2d 988, appeal dismissed.

George R. Mosler for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 384 U.S. 208, 209


384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208

BARRIOS ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

WINTERS v. WASHINGTON, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 WINTERS v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1143.
Decided May 16, 1966.

 67 Wash. 2d 465, 407 P.2d 988, appeal dismissed.

George R. Mosler for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 384 U.S. 208, 209


384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BARRIOS v. FLORIDA, 384 U.S. 208 (1966) 384 U.S. 208 BARRIOS ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 722.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Cowart, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.