BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

BAER v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Isadore Greenberg for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/154/case.html">384 U.S. 154</a> (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 384 U.S. 154, 155

 


U.S. Supreme Court

BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

BAER v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Isadore Greenberg for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/384/154/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/154/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/384/154/">384 U.S. 154</a></a></a> (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 384 U.S. 154, 155

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.