HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966)

U.S. Supreme Court

HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966)

383 U.S. 824

HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOCIATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 957.
Decided March 28, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 352 F.2d 350, vacated and remanded.

Arthur E. Gore for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harry Baum for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Malat v. Riddell, ante, p. 569.

Page 383 U.S. 824, 825




U.S. Supreme Court

HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966)

383 U.S. 824

HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOCIATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 957.
Decided March 28, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 352 F.2d 350, vacated and remanded.

Arthur E. Gore for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harry Baum for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Malat v. Riddell, ante, p. 569.

Page 383 U.S. 824, 825

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.