HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966) 383 U.S. 824HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOCIATION v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 957.
Decided March 28, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 352 F.2d 350, vacated and remanded.
Arthur E. Gore for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harry Baum for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Malat v. Riddell, ante, p. 569.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 957.
Decided March 28, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 352 F.2d 350, vacated and remanded. Arthur E. Gore for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harry Baum for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Malat v. Riddell, ante, p. 569. Page 383 U.S. 824, 825
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOC. v. COMM'R INTERNAL REVENUE, 383 U.S. 824 (1966) 383 U.S. 824 HOLLYWOOD BASEBALL ASSOCIATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 957.
Decided March 28, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 352 F.2d 350, vacated and remanded. Arthur E. Gore for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harry Baum for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Malat v. Riddell, ante, p. 569. Page 383 U.S. 824, 825
Search This Case
