PUGACH v. NEW YORK,
383 U.S. 575 (1966)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
PUGACH v. NEW YORK, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)
383 U.S. 575 PUGACH v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 131, Misc.
Decided March 21, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
Petitioner pro se.
Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)
383 U.S. 575 COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION OF MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK, ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1040.
Decided March 21, 1966.
248 F. Supp. 316, appeal dismissed.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, Ruth Kessler Toch, Acting Solicitor General, and William A. Stevens for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111; Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 382 U.S. 281.
