BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, 383 U.S. 574 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, 383 U.S. 574 (1966)
383 U.S. 574 BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 923.
Decided March 21, 1966.
253 Miss. 812, 178 So.2d 683, appeal dismissed.
Upton Sisson and Forrest B. Jackson for appellant.
L. Arnold Pyle and Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
KUKICH v. SERBIAN EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH, PITTSBURGH, 383 U.S. 574 (1966)
383 U.S. 574 KUKICH ET AL. v. SERBIAN EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 931.
Decided March 21, 1966.
418 Pa. 634, 213 A. 2d 80, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Harry Alan Sherman for appellants.
Harry Edward Leas for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, 383 U.S. 574 (1966)
383 U.S. 574 BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.
No. 923.
Decided March 21, 1966.
253 Miss. 812, 178 So.2d 683, appeal dismissed.
Upton Sisson and Forrest B. Jackson for appellant.
L. Arnold Pyle and Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
KUKICH v. SERBIAN EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH, PITTSBURGH, 383 U.S. 574 (1966)
383 U.S. 574 KUKICH ET AL. v. SERBIAN EASTERN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 931.
Decided March 21, 1966.
418 Pa. 634, 213 A. 2d 80, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Harry Alan Sherman for appellants.
Harry Edward Leas for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
